<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2017 Prediction: Google Acquires Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/2017-prediction-google-acquires-internet/1628/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/2017-prediction-google-acquires-internet/1628/</link>
	<description>Search engine news, SEO Tips, Google updates, SEO articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/2017-prediction-google-acquires-internet/1628/comment-page-1/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/04/17/2017-prediction-google-acquires-internet/#comment-2560</guid>
		<description>Ha! That&#039;s a good one, but I would say that the writer is seven years *behind* the curve. The way Google is going, 2010 will be more like it.

All this raises one big question -- will Google eventually be subject to anti-trust scrutiny or will they be able to hide behind their borderless operation? My thinking is that the US Justice Department may one day intervene. Then again, I doubt that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! That&#039;s a good one, but I would say that the writer is seven years *behind* the curve. The way Google is going, 2010 will be more like it.</p>
<p>All this raises one big question &#8212; will Google eventually be subject to anti-trust scrutiny or will they be able to hide behind their borderless operation? My thinking is that the US Justice Department may one day intervene. Then again, I doubt that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

