Recently, a news was flashing all over the web world that Google blog search link command is now scanning blogroll links. For example, using a link:www.pagetrafficbuzz.com would not only return links from the content of the article, but also return links from the navigational elements.
So the crux of the matter is that you will find it difficult as to who linked to you within the body of their content! All credit to Vanessa Fox who at one of the forums at Google Groups noticed as to what Googler, Jeremy Hylton has to say on this whole issue.
Here is Jeremy's post:
We have changed the way we index blog posts to include the full content of the page. We've had occasional complaints about the use of the feed content, particularly the problem with partial feeds that you mentioned. The indexing change has improved the results for a lot of queries, both because we have the full content of the page and because we extract links that are missing from the feeds. The downside of this change is that we see more results that match only the blogroll and other parts of the page that are common to all of a blog's posts.
We expected some problems from blogroll matches, but may have underestimated the impact on searches using the link: operator or where the query matches a blog or blogger's name. We do expect to fix the problem you're seeing. We'll use the full page content, but exclude the content that isn't really part of the post. I'm not sure if we'll be able to make the change before the end of the year, but we are working on it and are pretty confident that it can be solved. We'll post an update here when we've got a solution.
So we can hope that Google will soon change the behavior early next year.
Forum discussion at Google Groups.
Recommend this story
Navneet Kaushal, CEO PageTraffic is a trusted authority in the search engine marketing industry. He is a featured author at Web Pro News, Search Newz, Promotionworld, Website Notes, DevWebPro, SEO Article and Web Help Now among many others.
Follow Navneet Kaushal on Google +.
@pagetraffic
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
I hope Google takes care of this blogroll issue soon. Thanks for the full explanation.
I just read your update on this in the post you made on February 27, I wonder something. Because Google was having this issue, does that mean that with the Blogroll links being included the results were coming back with irrelevant results?