<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Claims That Pages That Validate Do Not Rank High!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-claims-that-pages-that-validate-do-not-rank-high/7046/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-claims-that-pages-that-validate-do-not-rank-high/7046/</link>
	<description>Search engine news, SEO Tips, Google updates, SEO articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rlslog</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-claims-that-pages-that-validate-do-not-rank-high/7046/comment-page-1/#comment-351013</link>
		<dc:creator>rlslog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-claims-that-pages-that-validate-do-not-rank-high/7046/#comment-351013</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s weird tho! 
SEO experts always told me I had to validate my html to rank higher. 
Intresting article. thanks! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s weird tho!<br />
SEO experts always told me I had to validate my html to rank higher.<br />
Intresting article. thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @seoer</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-claims-that-pages-that-validate-do-not-rank-high/7046/comment-page-1/#comment-350985</link>
		<dc:creator>@seoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-claims-that-pages-that-validate-do-not-rank-high/7046/#comment-350985</guid>
		<description>They probably admit one thing, but they do take a different behavior apparently. I&#039;ve two test case where for minor keywords I&#039;ve been able to shift up into the SERP just adjusting and fixing all the HTML code. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They probably admit one thing, but they do take a different behavior apparently. I&#039;ve two test case where for minor keywords I&#039;ve been able to shift up into the SERP just adjusting and fixing all the HTML code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

