Comments on: Google October 2007 Page Rank Update Harms Many Link Farms!

By: daus

daus — Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:51:45 +0000

nice and clean post ever i seen , thanks for sharing ya..

keep up your hardwork bro

By: MyCommu

MyCommu — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:16:28 +0000

Thanks for posting great job.

By: Michael Woo

Michael Woo — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:42:05 +0000

It's just Google's huge plan to manipulate the entire online advertising arena – you say it they deny it but when time is right, they will unveil their new plans on online advertising..

Devaluing PR doesn't really mean anything – advertisers will still have the cash to buy links while there would be new publishers who are interested in monetizing their site. Even you punish the existing participants, what about the new sites?

It's a big cat and mouse game without any ending.. It's just Google exercising their power as a market monopoly..

By: Hype Marketing Blog » Blog Archive » Matt Cutts Responds To Google PageRank Update

Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:19:33 +0000

[...] terminal week's doable PageRank update where many blogs were affected, Google Guy Matt Cutts confirms the update in a honor to [...]

By: Miami Real Estate

Miami Real Estate — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:22:10 +0000

My page rank was 4 before this happened, but I believe I may have been punished by google for excessive reciprocal linking, which I have stopped. I used to be very high under the term miami real estate,but I have been pushed back to the 70th page for about 2 months or more now, although under the image search, my site is on the first page of most relevant search terms. I requested reinclusion. Any ideas?

By: Another Google PageRank Update? » Unofficial SEO Blog

Another Google PageRank Update? » Unofficial SEO Blog — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:48:58 +0000

[...] most of the sites mentioned in the old blog whose PageRank fell, have gone back to almost the same PageRank, [...]

By: Possible Google PageRank Update » PageTraffic Blog -SEO, Link Building, Life at PageTraffic

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:21:21 +0000

[...] most of the sites mentioned in the old blog whose PageRank fell, have gone back to almost the same PageRank, [...]

By: Matt Cutts Responds To Google PageRank Update » Unofficial SEO Blog

Matt Cutts Responds To Google PageRank Update » Unofficial SEO Blog — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:48:56 +0000

[...] last week's possible PageRank update where many blogs were affected, Google Guy Matt Cutts confirms the update in a letter to [...]

By: tish grier

tish grier — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:23:56 +0000

Hi Navneet,

I found something rather strange–after my blog went down, to 4, it bounced back up to 5 again. I have no idea how that happened, but it did. It seems that google was going thru some sort of adjustment.

It was actually worse for me when I got dropped from google search because I did not change my template when switching over from Blogger to Google/Blogger. Got that straightened out too and I'm actually coming up in search a lot now.

I actually think Jon Dingman has a good point. But Technorati's been weird with counting links (or NOT counting links) for a long time. So, there really is no one metric that should be the only way to "value" a blog.

By: La psicologia

La psicologia — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:33:25 +0000

My site's pagerank was updated this morning.

It stepped from three to four.

Not bad

By: Google Full PageRank Update Is Here! » Unofficial SEO Blog

Google Full PageRank Update Is Here! » Unofficial SEO Blog — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:37:25 +0000

[...] on the heels of Google PR Update of Blogs we now can see the PageRank updated for all the [...]

By: Navneet Kaushal

Navneet Kaushal — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:34:39 +0000

Popo,

You are right. It seems Google been little harsh on these sites. However the good thing is that none of these sites has lost any rankings in Google. So at the end of the day we can safetly assume that Google is not getting rid of its PR from the Google Toolbar, else they should not have done this update.

By: Popo

Popo — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:16:19 +0000

Google's desire to "punish" is a scary vision of things to come.

Let's be clear: The goal of the web publishing business is to maximize numbers of interested viewers. How do we do this? We link. We rank.

To suggest that publishers are engaging in some sort of "dark side" activity by attempting to increase page rank is to suggest that one's own promotion is "evil".

But it gets worse, because the reason Google is doing this, is to put more pressure on publishers to buy Google's paid search terms.

Google is the pot calling the kettle black. It's chastising publishers for acting in their own economic self interest, while doing exactly that. And for the record, claiming that this helps the quality of rankings is very questionable. Because who wins? Lesser known sites that have fewer crosslinks? Hmm…

Hey Google… don't be evil?

By: Matt Ellsworth

Matt Ellsworth — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:55:43 +0000

well we have seen one article directory go from 4 to 2 and one blog from 5 to 3. However – the other sites we run don't seem to have changed so they likely haven't been updated yet.