<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google To Re-examine The Page Rank Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/</link>
	<description>Search engine news, SEO Tips, Google updates, SEO articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navneet Kaushal</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>Navneet Kaushal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 07:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>Neil,

Yes it is strange that it will affect your site only for top phrases. But strange is the right word for Google! We have seen it for few other sites too.

All backlinks listed by you seems good. However ensure they are not from the sponsored section of these sites.

I agree with you that there is something else also (possibly a Google Bug, as Adam Lasnik has acknowledged earlier last month.

Google Webmaster Central seems to be the best way as of now to conduct a Google backlink audit. Combine it with Joe&#039;s greasemonkey extension for firefox you can Add PageRank, Anchor Text, Link Status &amp; NoFollow Data to Google&#039;s Webmaster Central Link Tool. The script can be found here: http://www.joostdevalk.nl/code/greasemonkey/gwt-external-links/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>Yes it is strange that it will affect your site only for top phrases. But strange is the right word for Google! We have seen it for few other sites too.</p>
<p>All backlinks listed by you seems good. However ensure they are not from the sponsored section of these sites.</p>
<p>I agree with you that there is something else also (possibly a Google Bug, as Adam Lasnik has acknowledged earlier last month.</p>
<p>Google Webmaster Central seems to be the best way as of now to conduct a Google backlink audit. Combine it with Joe&#039;s greasemonkey extension for firefox you can Add PageRank, Anchor Text, Link Status &#038; NoFollow Data to Google&#039;s Webmaster Central Link Tool. The script can be found here: <a href="http://www.joostdevalk.nl/code/greasemonkey/gwt-external-links/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joostdevalk.nl/code/greasemonkey/gwt-external-links/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmi</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3510</link>
		<dc:creator>elmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 20:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3510</guid>
		<description>Go Here For Tons Of Affiliate Tools: Http://www.keywordelite.com/affiliate/ Create 1000s Of Adsense Keywords, Dominate Adwords</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Here For Tons Of Affiliate Tools: Http://www.keywordelite.com/affiliate/ Create 1000s Of Adsense Keywords, Dominate Adwords</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Street</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>Navneet:
Thanks for suggestions. My site just came back after 72 hours, to right where it was. I get what you say about bad backlinks, but how could that affect the site only for my top phrase? Lots of other key phrases stayed just fine in the rankings, and this included ranking for the home page. My site is back now for its key phrase, but I am really curious about what&#039;s going on. I have seen this before, both for me and others. 
     Just fyi: I have very few recips as a percentage of links, no paid links at all, no bad neighborhood. My most recent links came from About.com, the Toronto Star, and the Chicago Tribune, from columnists.
     I think there is something else triggering these &quot;disappearance,&quot; but I don&#039;t know what! (Maybe aliens...) BTW -- what&#039;s the best tool you suggest for Google backlink audit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navneet:<br />
Thanks for suggestions. My site just came back after 72 hours, to right where it was. I get what you say about bad backlinks, but how could that affect the site only for my top phrase? Lots of other key phrases stayed just fine in the rankings, and this included ranking for the home page. My site is back now for its key phrase, but I am really curious about what&#039;s going on. I have seen this before, both for me and others.<br />
     Just fyi: I have very few recips as a percentage of links, no paid links at all, no bad neighborhood. My most recent links came from About.com, the Toronto Star, and the Chicago Tribune, from columnists.<br />
     I think there is something else triggering these &#034;disappearance,&#034; but I don&#039;t know what! (Maybe aliens&#8230;) BTW &#8212; what&#039;s the best tool you suggest for Google backlink audit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenB</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>Please clarify Bad Neigborhood, what are the signs, what to look out for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please clarify Bad Neigborhood, what are the signs, what to look out for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navneet Kaushal</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Navneet Kaushal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>Gilbert,

We have actually tested the theory of backlinks and yes you can actually hurt your competition with this!.(though we have not done something like this)

Its more of the sudden spur in number of links which can hurt your site. If these links are coming from same site or are too many in numbers it is known to make difference (read negative) in your rankings in Google.

However Google factors other reasons too. Its more based on how their algo continues to get refined.

Even Matt has recently stated that Google will be going after paid links. More at:
http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/04/16/googles-math-hidden-links-paid-links-spam/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gilbert,</p>
<p>We have actually tested the theory of backlinks and yes you can actually hurt your competition with this!.(though we have not done something like this)</p>
<p>Its more of the sudden spur in number of links which can hurt your site. If these links are coming from same site or are too many in numbers it is known to make difference (read negative) in your rankings in Google.</p>
<p>However Google factors other reasons too. Its more based on how their algo continues to get refined.</p>
<p>Even Matt has recently stated that Google will be going after paid links. More at:<br />
<a href="http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/04/16/googles-math-hidden-links-paid-links-spam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/04/16/googles-math-hidden-links-paid-links-spam/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t quite understand how backlinks can HURT you.  If that&#039;s the case, all I need to do to move up is submit my competitors to every seedy porn/casino/pharmacy site I can find...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#039;t quite understand how backlinks can HURT you.  If that&#039;s the case, all I need to do to move up is submit my competitors to every seedy porn/casino/pharmacy site I can find&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navneet Kaushal</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>Navneet Kaushal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>D. Barkett,

You should wait for few more days. However in the meanwhile it will be wiser if you do a link audit of your backlinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D. Barkett,</p>
<p>You should wait for few more days. However in the meanwhile it will be wiser if you do a link audit of your backlinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nav</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>Nav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>I am also noticing changes in few sites PR and drop in rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also noticing changes in few sites PR and drop in rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navneet</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3501</link>
		<dc:creator>navneet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3501</guid>
		<description>Stephen,

Just to be double sure, ensure you don&#039;t have a backlink coming from a bad neighbourhood or have recently undertaken extensive link building for these sites. These two seems to be the main reasons for decrease in PR or sites disappearing from Google rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,</p>
<p>Just to be double sure, ensure you don&#039;t have a backlink coming from a bad neighbourhood or have recently undertaken extensive link building for these sites. These two seems to be the main reasons for decrease in PR or sites disappearing from Google rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navneet</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>navneet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>Neil,

I will say its more to do with some backlinks being discounted by Google as reciprocal or paid links. We have seen this for some of the sites.

Best is to examine the PR of those sites which link back to you and also the cache. You need to check and ensure that none of the links are from a bad neighbourhood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>I will say its more to do with some backlinks being discounted by Google as reciprocal or paid links. We have seen this for some of the sites.</p>
<p>Best is to examine the PR of those sites which link back to you and also the cache. You need to check and ensure that none of the links are from a bad neighbourhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Street</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>Is anyone seeing any correlation between their change in Page Rank (+ or -) and their SERPS? My went from 3 to 4, but the site dropped out of the top 100 on Google (it was # 13) for top key phrase. But still showing well for other phrases. Bizarre!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone seeing any correlation between their change in Page Rank (+ or -) and their SERPS? My went from 3 to 4, but the site dropped out of the top 100 on Google (it was # 13) for top key phrase. But still showing well for other phrases. Bizarre!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Barkett</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3498</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Barkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3498</guid>
		<description>My website experienced a dramatic increase.  It went from 0 to 3 overnight!  Really, I checked it the night before, and the next day that darn green bar was filling up.  I thought it was due to my SEO etc., but perhaps I had not as much to do with this as I had hoped.  

Your thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My website experienced a dramatic increase.  It went from 0 to 3 overnight!  Really, I checked it the night before, and the next day that darn green bar was filling up.  I thought it was due to my SEO etc., but perhaps I had not as much to do with this as I had hoped.  </p>
<p>Your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Burckhardt</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3497</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Burckhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3497</guid>
		<description>Something strange is going on with backlink reporting. Google Webmaster Central basically dropped backlinks for a client&#039;s site for a couple of days two weeks ago. The backlinks came back in the reporting, but now backlinks for the site are all over the board when checking in various tools. Don&#039;t know it that has anything to do with the toolbar PR drop my client got hit with or not, but something is weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something strange is going on with backlink reporting. Google Webmaster Central basically dropped backlinks for a client&#039;s site for a couple of days two weeks ago. The backlinks came back in the reporting, but now backlinks for the site are all over the board when checking in various tools. Don&#039;t know it that has anything to do with the toolbar PR drop my client got hit with or not, but something is weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenB</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3496</guid>
		<description>I have about 100 published sites and everyone that had page rank dropped some to 0 these sites have had rank for years. The traffic is a little down but I guess I will have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have about 100 published sites and everyone that had page rank dropped some to 0 these sites have had rank for years. The traffic is a little down but I guess I will have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Street</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 12:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>This week, on one of my sites, PR went up from 3-4. But what&#039;s weird, for my top keyword phrase only, the site disappeared from the top 100 in Google. Early in the week, it was about # 13, by midweek, it has vanished. However, for all my secondary keyword phrases, it is doing as well as ever - plenty of page one rankings. How can the site drop like that for just one phrase, that happens to be my top phrase, when it is doing as well as ever for other phrases? And when PR goes up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, on one of my sites, PR went up from 3-4. But what&#039;s weird, for my top keyword phrase only, the site disappeared from the top 100 in Google. Early in the week, it was about # 13, by midweek, it has vanished. However, for all my secondary keyword phrases, it is doing as well as ever &#8211; plenty of page one rankings. How can the site drop like that for just one phrase, that happens to be my top phrase, when it is doing as well as ever for other phrases? And when PR goes up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navneet</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3494</link>
		<dc:creator>navneet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3494</guid>
		<description>This is more due to dropping of some sites back links and Google shuffling its data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is more due to dropping of some sites back links and Google shuffling its data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zafer</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/1672/comment-page-1/#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>zafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/2007/05/02/google-to-re-examine-the-page-rank-update/#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>What is the reason for the general drop in PR ranks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the reason for the general drop in PR ranks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

