Google's Advises on the Dilemma Between Absolute and Relative URLs!

Jun 11, 2008 | 2,408 views | by Navneet Kaushal
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Almost every Webmaster is always eager to know, as to whether they should use absolute links or relative links, in an effort to optimize his website. Absolute URLs mean, that a Webmaster is linking a URL by using the portion as well, that would in turn link to the author's pages. So, in the case of, the link will become '' However, in the case of relative URLs, the relative URL for that author's page would be a link like '/authors.php.'

According to Search Engine Roundtable, Googler JohnMu has put up an insightful post at the Google Groups, for the same topic.

As JohnMu said, “There are pros and cons to both absolute and relative URLs in links:

Absolute URLs:
+ help keep the links pointing to your content if someone were to copy
it (*)
+ help keep the links pointing to your domain name if you cannot
select a canonical (can't do 301 redirects)
+ help make sure that you're pointing to the right URL even if you
move things around (say for stylesheets or graphics)
- cannot be tested on a staging / testing server (eg locally) (unless
you insert the links dynamically)
- makes it hard to move content (unless the links are inserted

Relative URLs:
+ make it easy to move content around
+ make it easy to test locally and on a staging server
- are easy to break if linking to content that isn't moved as well
(stylesheet, graphics, etc)
- an evil scraper would have less work (*)

There's a middle ground as well, using absolute links without a domain
name, eg: <a href="/resources/green/mostly/page.htm" …>

Personally, I prefer to use relative URLs + some absolute (without domain name) ones to shared resources. The advantage of being able to test things out 1:1 on a staging server can't compete with the pseudo- protection against scrapers.

The only place I would use absolute URLs would be if the site is hosted somewhere where the webmaster can't do a 301 redirect and may have trouble with duplicates. I've seen this a lot with sites hosted on a free account with the ISP; often it will be hosted as …, then perhaps… and… . By using absolute URLs in that situation, any value passed to one of the wrong URLs will automatically pass value to the correct URLs as well.

If you have a really good CMS you may be able to change from one to another and use a staging server without much work. In that case, it probably doesn't matter which one is chosen.”

Well, this should really narrow it down and all those Webmasters, who will read this post can now choose wisely.

Discussions continue at Google Groups.

4.thumbnail Googles Advises on the Dilemma Between Absolute and Relative URLs!

Navneet Kaushal

Navneet Kaushal is the founder and CEO of PageTraffic, an SEO Agency in India with offices in Chicago, Mumbai and London. A leading search strategist, Navneet helps clients maintain an edge in search engines and the online media. Navneet's expertise has established PageTraffic as one of the most awarded and successful search marketing agencies.
4.thumbnail Googles Advises on the Dilemma Between Absolute and Relative URLs!
4.thumbnail Googles Advises on the Dilemma Between Absolute and Relative URLs!