Spamming Wikipedia Leads To 'Shoot On Sight' Followed By Yahoo! & Google Penalties!

Oct 19, 2007 | 2,893 views | by Navneet Kaushal
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

Spam Wikipedia, and you will end up in one of the most dreaded places in the World Wide Web. Imagine a place where your site appears in the 'Spammer Blacklist' and Yahoo! And Google give you the cold shoulder.

jonathan-hochman1.jpg

This was the tone of things that would happen to anyone who spammed Wikipedia as Jonathan Hochman, Founder/President, Hochman Consultants said during the Wikipedia, Yahoo Answers & Answer Sharing session at the New York leg of SMX Social Media.

Speaking to Forbes' Andy Greenberg, Jonathan Hochman said: "The blacklist is public, so search engines can read it. You don't want to get on that list."

"Basically it's 'shoot on sight.' You're guilty until proven innocent."

Jonathan also writes in Search Engine Journal that:

"If you only end up on the Wiki blacklist, that might be ignored. If you do a bunch of other shady things, that signal starts to look consistent.

I know some of the people who run the blacklist. Being hardcore geeks, they enjoy watching what happens to the search rankings of the sites they add. Their impression is that being added to the list isn't a good thing for your search marketing campaign. Maybe that's wishful thinking on their part, or maybe not."

Spamming Wikipedia Leads To 'Shoot On Sight' Followed By Yahoo! & Google Penalties!, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Recommend this story

Navneet Kaushal

About the author:

Navneet Kaushal, CEO PageTraffic is a trusted authority in the search engine marketing industry. He is a featured author at Web Pro News, Search Newz, Promotionworld, Website Notes, DevWebPro, SEO Article and Web Help Now among many others. Follow Navneet Kaushal on Google +.

Related Articles

  • No Related Post

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Gregory Kohs October 19, 2007 at 20:01

Sounds like Wikipedia’s most active editors and admins are all about vengeance and punishment. Didn’t that that was part of the process of compiling the “sum of human knowledge”. Wikipedia was set up as the encyclopedia “anyone can edit”. Then they began an endless process of systematically prohibiting just about everyone from editing.

Wouldn’t this mess have been easier if they allowed corporate entities to edit within the “rules” of building an encyclopedia? The volunteers got it into their heads, though, that Wikipedia was only for volunteers without jobs, or still in school, or with a ton of free time. That’s how this encyclopedia has become the world’s most irresponsible website.

Reply

Kevin Smith August 22, 2008 at 16:23

Sounds great, unless the website you are promoting doesn’t rely on search engine results for its traffic. In fact, a person could theoretically funnel more traffic by consistently spamming Wikipedia then it would have gotten from the search results anyways.

Reply

Leave a Comment