<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urchin 6.5 Released With AdWords Integration!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/urchin-65-released-adwords-integration/5938/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/urchin-65-released-adwords-integration/5938/</link>
	<description>Search engine news, SEO Tips, Google updates, SEO articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CtrMeter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/urchin-65-released-adwords-integration/5938/comment-page-1/#comment-349639</link>
		<dc:creator>CtrMeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/urchin-65-released-adwords-integration/5938/#comment-349639</guid>
		<description>Although advertisers may choose smaller vendors to save money, there can be
drawbacks:
â€¢ They donâ€™t drive as much traffic.
â€¢ Possible savings can be reduced by the increased cost of campaign management
time.
â€¢ Some donâ€™t have adequate safeguards against click fraud.
According to eMarketer, Google received 75% of U.S. paid search advertising and
Yahoo! received 9% (http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/All/Emarketer_2000473.aspx).
This chapter will focus on the clear leader in reach, Google AdWords, and will compare
and contrast it with the two runners-up: YSM and Microsoft adCenter. The
most important differences among these three programs are in bulk editing, geotargeting,
and minimum bidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although advertisers may choose smaller vendors to save money, there can be<br />
drawbacks:<br />
â€¢ They donâ€™t drive as much traffic.<br />
â€¢ Possible savings can be reduced by the increased cost of campaign management<br />
time.<br />
â€¢ Some donâ€™t have adequate safeguards against click fraud.<br />
According to eMarketer, Google received 75% of U.S. paid search advertising and<br />
Yahoo! received 9% (<a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/All/Emarketer_2000473.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/All/Emarketer_2000473.aspx</a>).<br />
This chapter will focus on the clear leader in reach, Google AdWords, and will compare<br />
and contrast it with the two runners-up: YSM and Microsoft adCenter. The<br />
most important differences among these three programs are in bulk editing, geotargeting,<br />
and minimum bidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sales Training</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/urchin-65-released-adwords-integration/5938/comment-page-1/#comment-349629</link>
		<dc:creator>Sales Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/urchin-65-released-adwords-integration/5938/#comment-349629</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this.good site, keep posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this.good site, keep posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

