<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Varying Anchor Text, Is It Good Or Bad For SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/</link>
	<description>Search engine news, SEO Tips, Google updates, SEO articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/comment-page-1/#comment-351586</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/#comment-351586</guid>
		<description>I would say yes.  If you need 5000 keyword-rich links, then chances are you should worry more about the quality of the sites/pages linking to you, rather than the actual anchor text.  Anchor text is important, but if the site/page has no authority, it&#039;s not really gonna help you that much. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say yes.  If you need 5000 keyword-rich links, then chances are you should worry more about the quality of the sites/pages linking to you, rather than the actual anchor text.  Anchor text is important, but if the site/page has no authority, it&#039;s not really gonna help you that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: great stuff!</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/comment-page-1/#comment-351445</link>
		<dc:creator>great stuff!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/#comment-351445</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip! I was SOOOO wondering this myself!! Its tough to vary it up all the time, and remember how you did it...especially if you outsource your tasks...but good to know!
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip! I was SOOOO wondering this myself!! Its tough to vary it up all the time, and remember how you did it&#8230;especially if you outsource your tasks&#8230;but good to know!<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digital underground</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/comment-page-1/#comment-348508</link>
		<dc:creator>digital underground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 03:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/#comment-348508</guid>
		<description>so what about the link train schemes would that be the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what about the link train schemes would that be the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey Rusak</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/comment-page-1/#comment-348395</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey Rusak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/#comment-348395</guid>
		<description>Anchor should be different because similar anchor look spammy for Google and other search engines.
Also, it is very dangerous to change anchor on the links which already online. You can&#039;t contact webmasters to change anchor text after link was indexed by search engines. It is #1 sign that you are trying to reach top search engine positions and called &quot;anchor spam&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anchor should be different because similar anchor look spammy for Google and other search engines.<br />
Also, it is very dangerous to change anchor on the links which already online. You can&#039;t contact webmasters to change anchor text after link was indexed by search engines. It is #1 sign that you are trying to reach top search engine positions and called &#034;anchor spam&#034;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Page Rank &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Varying Anchor Text, Is It Good Or Bad For SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/comment-page-1/#comment-348394</link>
		<dc:creator>Page Rank &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Varying Anchor Text, Is It Good Or Bad For SEO?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/varying-anchor-text-is-it-good-or-bad-for-seo/4134/#comment-348394</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptRecently, a Search Engine Watch Forums thread asked a question, whether it is helpful or harmful to vary your anchor text in your SEO efforts, and should the anchor text be differentiated or not? â€œHey Guys, If you had 5000 backlinks and &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#039;s a quick excerptRecently, a Search Engine Watch Forums thread asked a question, whether it is helpful or harmful to vary your anchor text in your SEO efforts, and should the anchor text be differentiated or not? â€œHey Guys, If you had 5000 backlinks and &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

