<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! Topples Google In User Satisfaction Survey!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/yahoo-topples-google-in-user-satisfaction-survey/2450/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/yahoo-topples-google-in-user-satisfaction-survey/2450/</link>
	<description>Search engine news, SEO Tips, Google updates, SEO articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/yahoo-topples-google-in-user-satisfaction-survey/2450/comment-page-1/#comment-74512</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/yahoo-topples-google-in-user-satisfaction-survey/2450/#comment-74512</guid>
		<description>Reasons for difference in the numbers - random variation, poor sample comparisons, higher expectations of Google.  I rate all of those higher than the reason listed.  Just because they present numbers doesn&#039;t mean you have to accept that those numbers mean what the presenters claim.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2007/08/17/data-based-blathering/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Data Based Blathering&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasons for difference in the numbers &#8211; random variation, poor sample comparisons, higher expectations of Google.  I rate all of those higher than the reason listed.  Just because they present numbers doesn&#039;t mean you have to accept that those numbers mean what the presenters claim.  See <a href="http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2007/08/17/data-based-blathering/" rel="nofollow">Data Based Blathering</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Paugh</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetrafficbuzz.com/yahoo-topples-google-in-user-satisfaction-survey/2450/comment-page-1/#comment-72795</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Paugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unofficialseoblog.com/yahoo-topples-google-in-user-satisfaction-survey/2450/#comment-72795</guid>
		<description>Your article was well written and presented the facts of the story as
told by ACSI, however I have to ask the question of &quot;Who funded this
survey?&quot;

I ask this because, quite frankly, I don&#039;t know anyone who actually
USES Yahoo&#039;s search engine.  I work in the entertainment industry -- I
operate a House music record label -- and no one that I know uses nor
trusts Yahoo.  I asked a few of my interns who attend Portland State
University here in downtown Portland, OR where I am located, and they
had the same answer, &quot;No one uses Yahoo.&quot;

So, who funded this survey, and who actually USES Yahoo?

Thanks!
Chuck Paugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article was well written and presented the facts of the story as<br />
told by ACSI, however I have to ask the question of &#034;Who funded this<br />
survey?&#034;</p>
<p>I ask this because, quite frankly, I don&#039;t know anyone who actually<br />
USES Yahoo&#039;s search engine.  I work in the entertainment industry &#8212; I<br />
operate a House music record label &#8212; and no one that I know uses nor<br />
trusts Yahoo.  I asked a few of my interns who attend Portland State<br />
University here in downtown Portland, OR where I am located, and they<br />
had the same answer, &#034;No one uses Yahoo.&#034;</p>
<p>So, who funded this survey, and who actually USES Yahoo?</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Chuck Paugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

